Google CEO Sundar Pichai argued in a federal court hearing that the government's proposed measures to address the company's illegal monopoly in online search would hinder innovation and investment in new technologies. The case is a significant test of the U.S. government's efforts to regulate the power of tech giants in Silicon Valley.
Key Points
Google CEO Sundar Pichai highlighted potential negative consequences of government's proposed measures on innovation and investment.
The case could reshape power dynamics in Silicon Valley.
Government seeks to curb tech giants' power over online commerce, communications, and information.
Pros
Google CEO Sundar Pichai argues against government's aggressive proposals to remedy the company's illegal monopoly in online search.
Cons
Impact on Google's ability to innovate and invest in new technologies if forced to sell Chrome web browser and share data with rivals.