The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a case about the reach of federal laws protecting children with disabilities in public schools. Ava Tharpe, a girl with serious disabilities, sued her school for not accommodating her late-day schedule. The case will determine the standard parents must prove to qualify for compensatory damages under disability-rights laws.
Key Points
Ava Tharpe's case highlights the struggle of families with disabled children to receive proper accommodations in public schools
The Supreme Court will decide between a strict standard requiring 'bad faith or gross misjudgment' and a less stringent standard of 'deliberate indifference' for parents to qualify for compensatory damages
The outcome of the case could have far-reaching implications for disability rights in education
Pros
Potential to establish a more lenient standard for parents to qualify for compensatory damages under disability-rights laws
Could lead to better accommodations for children with disabilities in public schools
Cons
School systems may face increased liability if a more lenient standard is established