Legal Immunity and Judicial Action

SOURCE www.breitbart.com
Former Gov. Chris Christie suggested the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity could help Judge Hannah Dugan, who was charged with obstruction and concealment. The case involves questionable actions by the judge and potential legal immunity based on a previous ruling.

Key Points

  • The case involves a judge charged with obstruction and concealment.
  • Former Gov. Chris Christie and former Department of Justice spokesperson Sarah Isgur discuss the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity for Judge Dugan's case.
  • The Trump immunity decision may play a role in determining if judges are entitled to similar immunity from criminal prosecution.

Pros

  • The discussion sheds light on the complexities of legal immunity for judges and the potential implications of past Supreme Court rulings.

Cons

  • The situation raises concerns about the actions of Judge Hannah Dugan and the potential misuse of legal immunity.