Debunking false claims about the House-passed reconciliation bill

A viral graphic falsely claims that the House-passed reconciliation bill would allow Trump to delay or cancel elections, track protests, and ignore court orders. Legal experts debunk these claims, but raise concerns about limitations on judicial power. The bill also impacts LGBTQ+ rights, education, healthcare, and federal employees.

Toxic Work Environments in the Federal Judiciary

Federal judges have power over young law clerks, creating toxic work environments where speaking out could end a career. Despite serving as a check on President Trump's power, some judges exhibit misconduct and abuse their authority. The judiciary's internal human resources process is the final word, leaving employees with little recourse for mistreatment. Law clerks fear retaliation for reporting wrongdoing, perpetuating a culture of silence and fear.

Supreme Court review of Trump's birthright citizenship plan

The Supreme Court is considering Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship, focusing on the power of judges to block presidential policies nationwide. The administration argues that universal injunctions are hindering Trump's executive power. The court may limit the scope of injunctions, affecting how policies are implemented and challenged in court.

Criticism of activist judges and their impact on government policies

Rep. Jim Jordan criticizes activist judges for overreaching their role and trying to thwart the Trump administration's agenda. He emphasizes the importance of limiting their power and ensuring they do not make nationwide decisions.